Wed 21 May 2008
The Second Rosé of the Season
Posted by Fredric Koeppel under Best Wines , Restaurants[10] Comments
NEW YORK –
Monday we ate lunch at The Green Table, a small, spare, almost zen-like restaurant inside the vast and fascinating Chelsea Market, on Ninth Avenue just at the northern edge of the Meatpacking District, which now, of course, contains more restaurants, clubs and boutiques than meatpacking establishments. It’s amazing! There used to be no traffic except for trucks and no people except for meatpackers wearing bloody aprons and their customers in this formerly quiet, way out-of-the-way neighborhood.
Anyway, Chelsea Market is a huge building that features myriad wholesale and retail food emporiums and restaurants. One of our favorite places is Buon Italia, a store that imports all sorts of foodstuffs from Italy. When we go to NYC, we always make it over to Buon Italia to pick up guanciale, coppa, panchetta and other cured meats. lime honey — great on my toast in the morning — and other items.
We stopped by The Green Table, an all-organic (but not necessarily vegetarian) off-shoot of The Cleaver Co catering group. LL had baked eggs with ramps and potatoes and a little salad, and I had macaroni-and-cheese, also with a salad. A nice lunch.
Now the glass of wine I ordered will, I’m sorry to say, have relevance only to BTYH readers in the Northeast. It was the Wölffer Estate Rosé 2007, from Sagaponack, The Hamptons, Long Island. This is a very spare, very dry rosé wine in the Provençal
fashion, but there’s nothing Provençal about its make-up, which is 40% chardonnay, 35% merlot, 17% cabernet sauvignon and 8% cabernet franc. That roster of grapes raises the question: If the wine contains 40% chardonnay grapes, is it only 60% an actual rosé?
The estate was founded in 1987. Winemaker is Roman Roth, who has made wine in his native Germany, in California and Australia.
The wine, made, not surprisingly, all in stainless steel, is a classic pale copper/onion skin color. The bouquet offers notes of dried strawberry and and fresh peach with hints of dried thyme and wet rocks. The mineral quality intensifies in the mouth, while touches of pear and melon are added to the flavor spectrum, with more backnotes of dried herbs; the wine is vibrantly clean and crisp. This would be a great picnic wine, served with fried chicken, deviled eggs, ham, potato salad and such.
I rate the wine Very Good+. It costs about $15 at the winery.
Visit wolffer.com.
May 21st, 2008 at 1:53 pm
Hey Fredric…glad you got to taste this LI rose…it’s usually one of my wife’s favorites and this vintage is no different.
If you want, feel free to use the picture I took of the label for my review on LENNDEVOURS: http://lennthompson.typepad.com/lenndevours/2008/04/wtn-wolffer-est.html
May 21st, 2008 at 4:07 pm
Fredric,
In the 80s, I worked in the building that now houses the Chelsea Market. Then, we had a greasy spoon on the ground floor and an elevator that scared the crap out of me every time I got in it.
At night, the area was quiet, lonely, and quite scary, except for the steakhouse that always had a gangster or two paying a visit–back to the wall, thank you very much!
As for the Wolffer: haven’t had that wine, but the products are generally good to outstanding. But I might refer to it as a Long Island blush rather than rose–it’s the purist in me…
May 21st, 2008 at 7:24 pm
Hey, Lenn, thanks for reading the post and thanks for the link. The problem isn’t finding an image; i got one from the winery website… it’s that stupid WordPress won’t let me add it to the text. I’ll try when I get back from this trip.
Thomas, thank goodness again for the purtist in you.
May 26th, 2008 at 10:13 am
My impression of the Wolffer rose a couple of years ago was that it was so thoroughly “bone dry” that if you didnt know what you were drinking you might think it was Chablis. I love good chablis, of course, and yes, we don’t want the sugery “pink wine” of many years ago (Lancers?); but rose should, after all, have a hint of fruit and sweetness about it, otherwise what’s the point? In our rush to sophistication,
and to avoid the overly sweet realizations of roses in the past, lets not lose what makes them special.
May 26th, 2008 at 3:16 pm
Ed, I certainly agree about the fruit that a good rose ought to display — and I thought the Wolffer 07 performed that task handily — but I disagree about the sweetness. I understand that this aspect hinges on personal preference, but give me the “bone-dry” roses of Provence or one like Robert Sinsky’s great Vin Gris de Pinor Noir. Sure, I’ll drink a rose with a touch of sweetness, but I really adore the dry, crisp style. Fortunately, the wine comes in many styles for many tastes.
May 29th, 2008 at 1:46 pm
Frederic,
It shouln’t be “either or” of course in rose, but rather a hint of sweetness balanced by crisp
acidity. That perfect balance is unfortunately quite rare, usually because of the cloying sweetness (and also poorly delineated fruit), but for me the Wolffer misses in the other direction: so dry (almost flinty) that it masks the “rose”.
May 30th, 2008 at 9:34 am
Rose is a difficult style to make beyond boring. Normally they are too feeble and weak to have much in the way of charm. I don’t really go for rose Champagne either, with a few notable exceptions.
Two rose wines stick out in my mind a not only worth bothering with but also worth a special look out for. Chateau Pibarnon Bandol rose has a real depth of character as well as plenty of fruit. A stylish wine that is just great with a barbecue over the summer. You’ve got to love Mourvedre even when it is in rose form. The other wine is Ernest Burn’s Pinot Noir rose from Alsace is a veritable fruit bomb of lovely Pinot fruit. A great summer drink.
May 31st, 2008 at 8:56 am
David, I haven’t had the Burn pinot rose but I certainly agree about the Pibarnon Bandol rose; that’s a lovely drink.
June 1st, 2008 at 5:37 am
[...] http://biggerthanyourhead.net Show Bookmarks Hide Bookmarks [...]
August 8th, 2011 at 4:56 pm
When I read, I tend to let my thought wander, but this article kept me focused. That’s a real feat. You did a good job.