Fri 8 Dec 2006
At the risk of lulling you into slack-jawed insensibility, I have to quote the text on the front on a bottle of Gold, which is, by the way, very difficult to read:
“In the ancient world, rulers of kingdoms long lost and some still part of current memory made wine and mined gold.Their armies fought to keep it and ranged over the earth to obtain it. Legends stretched across the millennia, steeped in mystery and religion. Tales of kings living for generations, ancient tribal leaders speaking of battles they fought hundreds of years before, the holy grail, knights templar, women wise and young, all of their non-believing friends old and gone forever. Their secret … was kept hidden by open display. Sprinkling gold into their freshest white wine they drank to their health, happiness and long lives. This they did with a pure heart, over the very heights of summer and the depths of winter needing to believe that summer would come again. Summer is a time of legend, so let us embrace the golden sun that makes this wine, warms our bodies and hearts. Have fun my friends and be good to each other … 999.9 Pure.” 
100 percent pure bullshit, more like. I mean, really, to whom is this exercise in oratory, like something written by Dan Brown with Tolkien and Madame Blavatsky looking over his shoulder, intended to appeal? Certainly not to intelligent wine consumers. Nor will the wine, which is white with real 24K gold leaf sprinkled in it and for all the hype and complicated back-story actually pretty damned boring, though it costs $20 a bottle.
Nothing on the bottle indicates a vintage — it says “Bottled in June, 2006″ on the back — nor are we informed about a region or appellation, only the words “Product of Australia,” or a grape. The wine, we are informed, is bottled by Gold in St. Helena, Ca., but imported by Angels’ Share in Brooklyn.
A letter from Jason Woodbridge, the “proprietor” of Gold, explains that he likes “making wines that break the rules.” He does say that the wine is made primarily from chardonnay with “other varietals that are also aromatic, and rich on their own and beautiful in combination.” The wine is shipped from the “Southern Hemisphere” “in an ocean-going freezer container while still on the lees at 25 degrees.”
Boy, that’s a lot of effort to produce a wine that smells vaguely floral, tastes generically citrusy and sports a modest texture and a bit of bitterness on the finish. I tasted two bottles with similar results.
This whole project reeks of over-determined marketing, shaky syntax and bad faith. Leave the pseudo-mysticism to the pseudo mystics and the winemaking to real winemakers. All that glitters is not Gold.
December 9th, 2006 at 4:13 pm
Makes you want to run right out and buy something else.
BTW, thanks for the encomium in Blogs I Look at Every Day. I asked you to put the contact info there just in case someone wants to throw money at me or a more rewarding line of work than teaching a class full of ADHD adolescents. Ya never know.
December 9th, 2006 at 5:11 pm
Or perhaps someone would actually send you a bottle of wine!
December 9th, 2006 at 5:30 pm
Gee, I hadn’t thought of THAT.
December 10th, 2006 at 1:59 am
So the thing is this. I walk into a wine store. There’s tons of wines to choose from.
But the difference is: I have read “The Lord of the Rings” so many times I can recite the books from memory.
Now. You tell me. Do I pick the strange French wine named after a bicycle. Or do I pick this wine with the epic novel written on it.
It’s called marketing, Koeppel, and you shouldn’t be such a hard ass about it. I mean, come on. You wouldn’t buy an Elvis Presley label wine except to get the picture of Elvis, would you? The modern age is all about the label, man. Sad but true.
December 10th, 2006 at 12:38 pm
Yeah, MOV, but that’s the point. As you say, “the modern age is all about the label, man. Sad but true.” So maybe we can cut through all the marketing and label crap and point readers who care about good wine (or whatever) in the right direction. Do we HAVE to be a culture completely directed by marketing and advertising in all its blatant and insidious forms? I know it’s difficult in the retail store, where people don’t know the Three Blind Moose label from Marilyn Merlot, but I can’t help feeling it’s important to make these distinctions. I know, I’m a purist, and it ain’t easy, but that’s what I have to do.
December 10th, 2006 at 3:18 pm
Like, you’re so pure, man.
December 10th, 2006 at 5:37 pm
Can’t help it. When I was a lad, my mother read Keats to me aloud.
December 11th, 2006 at 5:04 pm
Last year I grabbed a case to sell as I thought someone would like the sizzle and I thought it would make a “hot” Valentines Day present. Wrong! I just last weekend sold my last nine bottles to a customer who thinks it is the only wine that doesn’t give her sinus headaches. She drove 15 miles across town to get the wine.
From now on it is a special order wine only!
From the same producer, now I am hearing that Hundred Acre is trying to tie their $250 Shiraz sales to their $290 Cab sales. Guess there goes my Cab allocation this year!
December 11th, 2006 at 9:22 pm
What’s that old saying about polishing a turd?
December 11th, 2006 at 9:34 pm
I’ve not heard that old saying, but I’ll have to use it sometimes, if you don’t mind.
December 12th, 2006 at 2:21 pm
Fredric, i think you bring up a very good point with this post, overzealous marketing is costly from a finance and customer retention perspective. When wineries like this one go out on a limb (like putting gold into their wine?%!?) they are taking a huge risk of looking like donkeys. They may appeal to a few people, but they alienate the rest. They are taking the whole love-it or hate-it approach, when they should try to produce quality wine that people will enjoy.
December 12th, 2006 at 6:38 pm
Thanks, Ryan, you see exactly what I’m getting at with this post. I mean, there’s an issue of credulity here: how gullible or stupid to these people think we are? As you say, sell the wine on its quality, not some elaborate back-story.
December 14th, 2006 at 3:11 pm
I know Jayson Woodbridge. He’s a monumental prick. Everyone in Napa hates his guts.
December 14th, 2006 at 10:52 pm
Well, now, Napalocal, I wouldn’t be able to make a judgment on that assertion, which you certainly state rather strongly enough. If Jason Woodbridge wants to defend himself from the charge of being a monumental prick, he’s welcome to do so.
December 20th, 2006 at 5:37 pm
Aw, my boyfriend actually did get it for me as a “special” christmas gift. He knew I liked dry whites, and this one had a little extra something for the holidays. I’m going to keep it as a decoration for a bit before I actually drink it. How many wines can you do that with?! In any case, I don’t see the problem. It’s a niche wine. I’d rather he spent the little extra $$ on something that at least looks nice, since most people (myself included) don’t know good wine anyway.
December 20th, 2006 at 11:26 pm
So, Janene, you’re telling me, basically, to lighten up. Obviously I can’t do that; NOT lightening up is my mode of being. But I also would never deny you or anyone the pleasure you derive from whatever kind of wine you want to drink, even if it has gold flecks in it. On the other hand, I hope you will keep reading this blog and my website (there are links at the top of the page) and other blogs and so on to learn more about wine and how to drink it and think about it. That would make me happy.
December 21st, 2006 at 2:26 pm
[...] This Wine was featured in a very funny post – What Were They Thinking? – in Fredric Koeppel’s Bigger Than Your Head Blog [...]
January 14th, 2007 at 12:18 pm
cheap air ticket…
…
January 28th, 2007 at 8:37 pm
Hi,
I found your blog via google by accident and have to admit that youve a really interesting blog
Just saved your feed in my reader, have a nice day
January 29th, 2007 at 7:58 pm
It’s interesting how while you conduct yourself as a critic/blogger…you are fully aware that as a writer you get more bees with bad news than good. It’s fun to be ‘Pulpy’ isn’t it? It’s easy to sit on thine Pulpit and preach, but, I’ve yet to try ‘Koeppel Cuvee’. It just seems easy to me to drive the car from the back seat.
I think if you are going to lash out against the system and get back to purity; you might want to consider the risk assumed by who most wine critics are deeming one of the most impactive wine entrepreneurs to hit the international wine market in the last several years. His rise to stardom has no curve, it went straight up. Although eccentric, you’ve got to respect the risk assumed on Woodbridge’s behalf. Why wouldn’t he want to sit back on his laurels? The demand for 100 Acre alone seems enough to keep the ‘lad’ busy for a lifetime.
Easy, he’s insatiable, determined, like you, he desires to challenge the market place. It’s a creative mind in motion…Gold is just one facet. Jayson made a wine based on purity of fruit, no oak and obviously some gold flakes. As a wine purist as well, I took the same outlook on the wine, but, after consuming many bottles now…I’ve been well converted. I found the wine to live up to the said ‘marketing’ you seem to detest. Again, given your breadth of skill with a pen, I am sure if you made a wine…your marketing might seem well endowed, but, it’s perception not reality. The steps Woodbridge has taken to assemble Gold would seem a lot like he’s making Grand Cru as opposed to a $20 value relative to the world of wine.
Finally, I would venture to say that so many wine consumers in the US didn’t start with Saucisson and watery Vin Gris while frollicking through a ‘Keats-ian’ countryside. Typically it’s something sweet that doesn’t go well with much other than hot dogs. We can thank palate evolution, availability of wine on-line and restaurant wine lists for creating so many collectors/enthusiasts these days. The point, they had to start somewhere…why not Gold?
February 1st, 2007 at 10:47 am
First, thanks Florian, I hope you’ll keep reading.
Second, Enophiliac, you raise many issues and I’ll try to answer them in order. Yes. I may be a self-appointed purity-hound, but it’s because I hate to see all the nonsense that producers and their marketers erect between the making of good wine and the consuming of it. And to that task I bring 20 years of writing a weekly national wine column and two more years on the internet with my magazine-type website http://www.koeppelonwine.com
No, you’ll never see a Koeppel label; on the other hand, if winemakers are so great, why is there so much mediocre wine out there; if winemakers are so great, why do they deliberately give their chardonnays and pinot noirs so much oak that the wines are ghastly, undrinkable parodies. Winemakers are just people, and some of them happen to be bad at their business.
And, it’s easy to hire noted winemakers like Turley and Rolland as consultants to beef up the crew and tick up the cost of the wine on the marketplace. Sure Hundred Acre gets good reviews, but so do a lot of other expensive, hand-crafted cabernets in California.
As far as Gold is concerned, if the wine is good, it will stand on its own; good wines don’t need the gimmickry of gold flecks and pseudo-mythical rhapsodizing on the bottles to sell. Let the consumer be the final decider and drop the mystical crap. Based on the two bottle that I was sent, I happen to disagree that there’s anything good about Gold, and as far as what wines people should start with, I can think of a thousand that are far better, more authentic and cheaper.
February 7th, 2007 at 3:07 pm
Reading deeper into your commentary, I look at this like fractions. One comment crosses the other one out until you are left with the lone standing denominator: your distaste for American wine producers who have to put marketing in front of their quality of wine. It’s an interesting debate from my perspective.
I prefer the wines of the Macon for a summer day, Corbieres for a big red wine that is value orientated and I can definitely, at a moments notice, drink a Lafleur or Latour from the worst vintage…to me it’s all about the experience, good or bad. That being said, centuries of winemaking established said brands world wide and ultimately, they’ve evolved as Icons. I am sure that this somewhat feeble diatribe would not be focused at the likes of Haut Brion; even in the worst of vintages they’ve garnered respect from the most established of critics.
That notwithstanding, the Northern California wine producers are required to create marketing. There is no history to speak of but, in the words of the Carpenters, “we’ve only just begunâ€â€¦if you haven’t watched the Superbowl lately; there wasn’t an ad for Bryant Family at Halftime or Gold for that matter. It’s all about Beer…bad beer to boot, most of the time beer I wouldn’t pour for my worst enemy. So winemakers/owners have to ‘market’ to incite the American palate. A little romance goes a long way and Valentines Day is just around the corner.
With great pleasure, wine is beginning to win the war in the US with a very low level of marketing in relative terms to that of beer. Wine has become the most consumed alcoholic beverage in the States…much of that based on marketing. You’ve got to respect the evolution: one day the consumer is drinking a pretty beverage that isn’t Malt Liquor based and the next they are adventuring past the marketing top heavy wines to something they can’t pronounce or feel comfortable drinking until it hits their palate. The American psyche has been trained to pay attention to marketing and virtually not think on its own. Just ask Satchi and Satchi…they’ll tell you.
Finally, take a breath. I’d read this more often if you were original as opposed critical with a smarmy twist. I am fully aware of the fact that “all that shimmers isn’t Gold†but even diamonds start out as coal. Respect the evolution a bit more, see in 3-D. You are far more apart of the beginning and have more influence over the consumer than you know. Dr. Phil will tell you anger gets you nowhere, even in this passive aggressive blog.
February 9th, 2007 at 1:29 pm
Enophiliac: There’s nothing passive about my aggression; I would call it “passionate” aggression, because I feel very strongly about all these matters. It’s not marketing that I deplore: it’s mediocrity and mendacity. Too many people, producers, writers, publicists are willing to accept mediocrity and mendacity for the sake of a good story, a colorful blurb, an expression of novelty, an attractive magazine cover, a 20-second spot without considering the virtues or worth of the object at hand; in the 21st Century, unfortunately, all things are equal grist for media celebration. But uncritical thinking (in any field) dulls our perceptions and dooms us to accepting the second-rate (or worse), the specious, the over-hyped surface gleam, the dilution of precise language. Perhaps wine would be more of a success in America if producers and importers spent more on advertising; perhaps they should employ the marketers of all that bad beer. Of course I’m happy that wine is gaining headway in America, though the growth is still mighty slow. Television advertising on the Super Bowl (for example) might help, but what’s really needed is a different attitude in restaurants and retail stores, a hands-on approach that welcomes consumers into the sphere of drinking wine with meals every day, like, it’s OK to do that!
By the way, the dictionary at my elbow defines “smarmy” as “ingratiating, flattering, obsequious.” I think you will agree that BiggerThanYourHead is none of those.
February 9th, 2007 at 2:27 pm
Frederic: smarmy: revealing or marked by a smug, ingratiating, or false earnestness
The word ‘smarmy’ described the smug nature of your acumen followed by a lack of reality as it pertains to the challenges of winemaking. What do you do when your dream is making a wine and the Good Lord, Buddha, Allah or any other deity that rules your universe decides to challenge weather patterns and ultimately force your hand?
To me, its like the Kenny Rogers song, Lucille “you picked a fine time to leave me Lucille…four hungry children and the crops in the field†This is how these people make their money, feed their kids and otherwise provide for their life. What would you do? Damn right, you’d make the wine and market your knuckles off. You’d have to build your dream in print in order to make the sales. God isn’t going to ‘miracle’ the bottles off the shelf.
One thing you don’t know, Jayson Woodbridge, is willing to open a spicket and let juice run down the drain if it’s not up to standard. In other words, he is his own standard. Sometimes you take some knocks and keep learning, I think you are seeing that in motion. It’s obvious that his feet never stop moving and the wheel will never stop turning.
The ‘point’, “You’ve got to know when to hold’em/know when to fold’em/know when to walk away/know when to run†I see Woodbridge as a ‘gambler’ taking a risk and from the looks of it and he’s winning. “You never count your money, when you are sitting at the table, there will be time enough for counting when the dealins done†It will take a GPS to track the guy down; he’s never resting and insatiable with one pursuit, ‘making his dream real’. Appreciate the dream or make some wine and let someone else cheapen your effort. I think it would bring better perspective to your thoughts.
March 4th, 2007 at 4:00 am
Cool site. Thanks:-)
http://s-url.net/02yj/ hydrocodone addiction
March 11th, 2007 at 2:57 pm
Good site. Thank you!
http://s-url.net/02yj/ hydrocodone without prescription
March 16th, 2007 at 11:21 am
big dick gay leather…
abrikoskos 2079896 Search results for ‘big dick gay leather’….
March 16th, 2007 at 3:09 pm
review sbr…
abrikoskos 2079896 homepage of review sbr…
March 16th, 2007 at 6:45 pm
teen hairy pussy…
abrikoskos 2079896 Intresting information about teen hairy pussy….
March 16th, 2007 at 9:19 pm
free movie teacher ticket…
abrikoskos 2079896 free movie teacher ticket source…
March 17th, 2007 at 7:48 am
finance loan mortgage uk…
abrikoskos 2079896 finance loan mortgage uk source…
March 17th, 2007 at 10:21 am
les star nues…
abrikoskos 2079896 Search results for ‘les star nues’….
March 17th, 2007 at 3:27 pm
index ultratotty…
abrikoskos 2079896 Research about index ultratotty….
March 21st, 2007 at 8:36 am
xxx porn star gallery…
Reviews on xxx porn star gallery….
March 21st, 2007 at 3:08 pm
camel toe and cum…
Master information for camel toe and cum….
March 21st, 2007 at 5:05 pm
hot nude woman naked…
Latest hot nude woman naked news…
March 21st, 2007 at 7:14 pm
saloon door…
Relevant saloon door…
March 21st, 2007 at 9:17 pm
free hentai porn movie…
home | free hentai porn movie | contacts…
March 21st, 2007 at 11:22 pm
ass bbw…
ass bbw info…
April 1st, 2007 at 3:07 pm
i love this site..
April 2nd, 2007 at 12:04 pm
This is very interesting site
April 3rd, 2007 at 8:38 am
Excellent site, added to favorites!!
April 3rd, 2007 at 12:28 pm
kiss my ass…
kiss my ass start page…
April 3rd, 2007 at 4:16 pm
fat ass…
Relevant search results and links for fat ass…
April 3rd, 2007 at 7:03 pm
tit and ass…
This page contains some info about tit and ass…
April 3rd, 2007 at 7:58 pm
latin ass…
Reviews on latin ass….
April 3rd, 2007 at 9:47 pm
ass hole fever…
Actual news on ass hole fever category….
April 4th, 2007 at 2:32 am
Da nu Nah
April 4th, 2007 at 7:58 am
perfect ass…
This page contains some info about perfect ass…
April 6th, 2007 at 7:06 pm
Hello stupid pendosegi.
April 6th, 2007 at 11:33 pm
Skelaxin is a muscle relaxant. Skelaxin is used to treat the pain and stiffness of muscle injuries, including strains, sprains and muscle spasms. More on skelaxin 800mg here http://prescriptiondrugs.noprescriptiondrugstore.us/skelaxin.php
September 26th, 2007 at 11:24 am
Hi boys!ac1778aeea05bcdc5c129d02a935439e
January 21st, 2008 at 5:45 am
Lafarge to buy Orascom Cement for $12.8 bln link
August 22nd, 2008 at 12:00 pm
[...] you combine experience and good writing you get posts LIKE THIS ONE, in which Frederic shines the light of incredulity on his [...]
March 16th, 2011 at 5:04 am
[...] Wine was featured in a very funny post – What Were They Thinking? – in Fredric Koeppel’s Bigger Than Your Head [...]